The conventional wisdom for working with CFCs is that you should provide returntypes and argument types for methods. This idea stems from working with strongly-typed languages such as Java and C#. What if, though, we accepted ColdFusion as a dynamically-typed language, such as Smalltalk or Ruby? This talk explores the problems "duck typing" solves and the new possibilities it opens.
Add this blog's RSS
feed to your podcast player!
#1 by duncan on 6/12/07 - 4:35 AM
#2 by Elliott Sprehn on 6/12/07 - 5:30 AM
#3 by Douglas Reynolds on 6/13/07 - 5:55 PM
#4 by Elliott Sprehn on 6/13/07 - 6:37 PM
Sean, being awesome, stepped in and did the presentation instead.
#5 by Douglas Reynolds on 6/14/07 - 12:14 AM